1
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
2
Foster N, editor. Blackstone’s EU treaties & legislation 2017-2018. Twenty eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press
3
Quénivet NNR, Dadomo C. European Union law. Third edition. Saltford: : Hall & Stott Publishing 2020.
4
Chalmers D, Davies G, Monti G. European Union law: text and materials. Third edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: : Cambridge University Press 2014.
5
Barnard C, Peers S, editors. European Union law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017.
6
Schütze R. European Union law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
7
Schütze R. European constitutional law. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: : Cambridge University Press 2016.
8
Barnard C. The substantive law of the EU: the four freedoms. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
9
Woods L, Watson P, Costa M, et al. Steiner & Woods EU law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017.
10
Fairhurst J. Law of the European Union. Eleventh edition. New York: : Pearson 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5175070
11
Fairhurst J. Law of the European Union. Eleventh. New York, N.Y.: : Pearson 2016.
12
Dashwood A, Wyatt D. Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union law. 6th ed. Hart 2011.
13
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
14
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart 2011.
15
Jacobs FG, Arnull A, Eeckhout P, et al. Continuity and change in EU law: essays in honour of Sir Francis Jacobs. Oxford University Press 2008. http://eu01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=10395381120002461&institutionId=2461&customerId=2460
16
de Búrca G, Weiler JHH, editors. The European Court of Justice. Oxford University Press 2001.
17
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
18
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
19
Hartley TC. The foundations of European Union law: an introduction to the constitutional and administrative law of the European Union. Eighth. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
20
Hartley TC. Constitutional problems of the European Union. Hart 1999.
21
Tridimas T. The general principles of EU law. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press 2015.
22
Tridimas T. The general principles of EU law. Second. Oxford University Press 2006. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip068/2006005363.html
23
Ward I. A critical introduction to European law. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press 2009.
24
Weatherill S. Cases and materials on EU law. Twelfth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
25
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
26
Harpaz G. European Integration in the Aftermath of the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon: Quo Vadis? European Public Law 2011;17:73–89.http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2011007
27
Klamert M. Conflicts of legal basis: No legality and no basis but a bright future under the lisbon treaty? European Law Review;35:497–515.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
28
Hinarejos A. Integration in criminal matters and the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review 2011;36:420–30.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
29
Baker E, Harding C. From past imperfect to future perfect? A longitudinal study of the third pillar. European Law Review;34:25–54.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
30
Mitsilegas V. The third wave of third pillar law. Which direction for EU criminal justice? European Law Review 2009;34:523–60.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
31
Craig P. The Treaty of Lisbon, process, architecture and substance. European Law Review 2008;33:137–66.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
32
Peers S. The European Community’s criminal law competence: the plot thickens. European Law Review 2008;33:399–410.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
33
Herlin-Karnell E. The Ship–Source Pollution Case C–440/05, Commission v. Council , Judgment of 23 October 2007 (Grand Chamber). European Public Law 2008;14:533–44. doi:10.54648/EURO2008036
34
Dinan D. Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission. Journal of Common Market Studies;48:95–118.
35
Conway G. Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union. European Law Journal;17:304–22. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
36
Mikko M. Unveiling the Council of the European Union | Ch 2: ‘Voting and coalitions in the Council after Enlargement’. In: Naurin D, Wallace H, eds. Unveiling the Council of the European Union: games governments play in Brussels. Palgrave Macmillan 2008. 23–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ab345e06-b313-e711-80c9-005056af4099
37
Konig T, Junge D. Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power? European Union Politics;10:507–34. doi:10.1177/1465116509346780
38
de Waele H, Broeksteeg H. The semi-permanent European Council Presidency: Some reflections on the law and early practice. Common Market Law Review 2012;49:1039–74. doi:10.54648/COLA2012038
39
Dinan D. Governance and Institutions: Implementing the Lisbon Treaty in the Shadow of the Euro Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;49:103–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02183.x
40
BARBER T. The Appointments of Herman van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 2010;48:55–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02093.x
41
Editorial Comments: The post-Lisbon institutional package: Do old habits die hard? Common Market Law Review 2010;47:597–604. doi:10.54648/COLA2010027
42
Dinan D. Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission. Journal of Common Market Studies;48:95–118.
43
Bale T, Hanley S, Szczerbiak A. ‘May Contain Nuts’? The Reality behind the Rhetoric Surrounding the British Conservatives’ New Group in the European Parliament. Political Quarterly;81:85–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02067.x
44
Hagemann S, Høyland B. Bicameral Politics in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;48:811–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
45
Neyer J. Justice, Not Democracy: Legitimacy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;48:903–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02079.x
46
Crespy A, Gajewska K. New Parliament, New Cleavages after the Eastern Enlargement? The Conflict over the Services Directive as an Opposition between the Liberals and the Regulators. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;48:1185–208. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x
47
Buzek J. State of the Union: Three Cheers for the Lisbon Treaty and Two Warnings for Political Parties. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;49:7–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02190.x
48
Rittberger B. Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;50:18–37. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02225.x
49
Barents R. The Court of Justice after the Treaty of Lisbon. Common Market Law Review 2010;47:709–28. doi:10.54648/COLA2010031
50
Editorial Comments: Delivering justice: Small and bigger steps at the ECJ. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:987–93. doi:10.54648/COLA2011040
51
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
52
Hagemann S, Høyland B. Bicameral Politics in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;48:811–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
53
Héritier A. Institutional Change in Europe: Co-decision and Comitology Transformed. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;50:38–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02226.x
54
de Ruiter R, Neuhold C. Why Is Fast Track the Way to Go? Justifications for Early Agreement in the Co-Decision Procedure and Their Effects. European Law Journal;18:536–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00617.x
55
Klamert M. Conflicts of legal basis: No legality and no basis but a bright future under the lisbon treaty? European Law Review;35:497–515.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
56
Craig P. The ECJ and ultra vires action: A conceptual analysis. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:395–437.http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011018
57
Trubek DM, Trubek LG. Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination. European Law Journal;11:343–64. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x
58
Szyszczak E. Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination. European Law Journal;12:486–502. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00329.x
59
Hatzopoulos V. Why the Open Method of Coordination Is Bad For You: A Letter to the EU. European Law Journal;13:309–42. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00368.x
60
Sabel CF, Zeitlin J. Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU. European Law Journal;14:271–327. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x
61
Büchs M. How Legitimate is the Open Method of Co-ordination? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;46:765–86. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x
62
Dawson M. The ambiguity of social Europe in the open method of coordination. European Law Review 2009;34:55–79.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
63
Shore C. ‘European Governance’ or Governmentality? The European Commission and the Future of Democratic Government. European Law Journal;17:287–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00551.x
64
Dawson M. Three waves of new governance in the European Union. European Law Review 2011;36:208–25.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
65
Cass DZ. The Word that Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community. Common Market Law Review;29:1107–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2fd1d460-0bd1-e711-80cd-005056af4099
66
Toth AG. Is subsidiarity justiciable? European Law Review 1994;19.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
67
Emiliou N. Subsidiarity: Panacea or fig leaf? 📖 Legal issues of the Maastricht treaty. In: Legal issues of the Maastricht treaty. Chichester: : John Wiley and Sons Ltd 1994. 65–83.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c313c39c-ca3b-e711-80cb-005056af4099
68
Estella de Noriega A. The EU principle of subsidiarity and its critique. Oxford University Press 2002.
69
Barber NW. The Limited Modesty of Subsidiarity. European Law Journal;11:308–25. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00261.x
70
Davies G. Subsidiarity: The wrong idea, in the wrong place, at the wrong time. Common Market Law Review 2006;43:63–84. doi:10.54648/COLA2005083
71
Cooper I. The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;44:281–304. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00623.x
72
Barrett G. The king is dead, long live the king": the recasting by the Treaty of Lisbon of the provisions of the Constitutional Treaty concerning national parliaments. European Law Review 2008;33:66–84.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
73
Kiiver P. The Treaty of Lisbon, The National Parliaments and the Principle of Subsidiarity. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2008;15:77–84.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=77&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje15&collection=journals
74
Schütze R. Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism? The Cambridge Law Journal 2009;68:525–36. doi:10.1017/S0008197309990183
75
Kiiver P. The early-warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: the national parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe. European Law Review 2011;36:98–108.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
76
Cygan A. The parliamentarisation of EU decision-making? The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on national parliaments. European Law Review 2011;36:480–99.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
77
de León SA. Regions and Subsidiarity in the European Union: A Look at the Role of the Spanish and other Regional Parliaments in the Monitoring of Compliance with the Principle of Subsidiarity. European Public Law 2012;18:305–21. doi:10.54648/EURO2012017
78
Craig P. Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;50:72–87. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x
79
Horsley T. Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;50:267–82. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x
80
Beck G. The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court, the Primacy of EU Law and the Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: A Conflict between Right and Right in Which There is No Praetor. European Law Journal;17:470–94. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00559.x
81
MacCormick N. Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review;56:1–18.https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096572
82
Walker N. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Review;65:317–59. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00383
83
Kumm M. The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty. European Law Journal;11:262–307. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00260.x
84
Lenaerts K, Corthaut T. Of birds and hedges: the role of primacy in invoking norms of EU law. European Law Review 2006;31:287–315.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
85
Schutze R. Dual federalism constitutionalised: the emergence of exclusive competences in the EC legal order. European Law Review 2007;32.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
86
Dougan M. When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy. Common Market Law Review 2007;44:931–63.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095
87
Dickson J. Directives in EU Legal Systems: Whose Norms Are They Anyway? European Law Journal;17:190–212. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00544.x
88
Sabel CF, Gerstenberg O. Constitutionalising an Overlapping Consensus: The ECJ and the Emergence of a Coordinate Constitutional Order. European Law Journal;16:511–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00521.x
89
von Bogdandy A, Schill SW. Overcoming absolute primacy: Respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:1417–53. doi:10.54648/COLA2011057
90
Avbelj M. Theory of European Union. European Law Review 2011;36:818–36.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
91
Avbelj M. Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law-(Why) Does it Matter? European Law Journal;17:744–63. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00560.x
92
Isiksel NT. Fundamental rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat. European Law Journal;16:551–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x
93
Griller S. International Law, Human Rights and the Community’s Autonomous Legal Order. European Constitutional Law Review;4:528–53. doi:10.1017/S1574019608005282
94
Kunoy B, Dawes A. Plate tectonics in Luxembourg: The ménage à trois between EC law, international law and the European Convention on Human Rights following the UN sanctions cases. Common Market Law Review 2009;46:73–104. doi:10.54648/COLA2009003
95
Koutrakos P. The Court of Justice as the guardian of national courts - or not? European Law Review 2011;36:319–20.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
96
Lock T. Taking national courts more seriously? Comment on Opinion 1/09. European Law Review 2011;36:576–88.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
97
Craig P. The European Union Act 2011: Locks, limits and legality. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:1915–44. doi:10.54648/COLA2011074
98
Gordon M, Dougan M. The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: ‘who won the bloody war anyway?’ European Law Review 2012;37:3–30.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
99
Rawlings R. Legal politics: the United Kingdom and ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 1. Public Law;:254–78.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
100
Rawlings R. Legal politics: the United Kingdom and ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 2. Public Law;:367–91.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
101
Herdegen M. Maastricht and the German Constitutional Court: Constitutional Restraints for an "Ever Closer Union” and Document "Extracts from: Brunner v. The European Union Treaty (Bundesverfassungsgericht). Common Market Law Review 1994;31:235–62.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4e45a038-b213-e711-80c9-005056af4099
102
Weiler JHH. Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision. European Law Journal;1:219–58. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00030.x
103
Castillo de la Torre F. Tribunal Constitucional (Spanish Constitutional Court), Opinion 1/2004 of 13 December 2004, on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. Common Market Law Review 2005;42:1169–202. doi:10.54648/COLA2005033
104
Chalmers D. Editorial: Constitutional modesty. European Law Review 2005;30.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
105
Thym D. In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon judgment of the German Constitutional Court. Common Market Law Review 2009;46:1795–822. doi:10.54648/COLA2009074
106
Kiiver P. The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court: A Court-Ordered Strengthening of the National Legislature in the EU. European Law Journal;16:578–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00523.x
107
Ziller J. The German Constitutional Court’s Friendliness towards European Law: On the Judgment of Bundesverfassungsgericht over the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon. European Public Law 2010;16:53–73. doi:10.54648/EURO2010004
108
Payandeh M. Constitutional review of EU law after Honeywell : Contextualizing the relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:9–38. doi:10.54648/COLA2011002
109
Pliakos A, Anagnostaras G. Who is the ultimate arbiter? The battle over judicial supremacy in EU law. European Law Review 2011;36:109–23.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
110
Zbíral R. Czech Constitutional Court, judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12. A Legal revolution or negligible episode? Court of Justice decision proclaimed ultra vires. Common Market Law Review 2012;49:1475–91. doi:10.54648/COLA2012072
111
von der Groeben C. Aida Torres Perez. Conflicts of Rights in the European Union. A Theory of Supranational Adjudication. European Journal of International Law;22:296–300. doi:10.1093/ejil/chr017
112
Eckes C. Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order? European Law Journal;18:230–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00595.x
113
Itzcovich G. Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts. European Law Journal;18:358–84. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x
114
Scicluna N. When Failure isn’t Failure: European Union Constitutionalism after the Lisbon Treaty. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;50:441–56. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02239.x
115
Hilson C, Downes TA. Making sense of rights: Community rights in E.C. law. European Law Review 1999;24.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
116
Tridimas T. Black, White, and Shades of Grey: Horizontality of Directives Revisited. Yearbook of European Law 2001;21:327–54.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197523?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182
117
Barnard C, editor. The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies: Vol. 9: 2006-2007. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2007. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=1772426&ppg=143
118
Barnard C, editor. The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies: Volume 9: 2006-2007. Oxford: : Hart 2007.
119
Dougan M. When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy. Common Market Law Review 2007;44:931–63.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095
120
Barnard C, Academy of European Law. The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221
121
Academy of European Law (Florence, Italy). The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://academic.oup.com/book/2907
122
Craig P. The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions. European Law Review 2009;34.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
123
Leczykiewicz D. ‘Effective judicial protection’ of human rights after Lisbon: should national courts be empowered to review EU secondary law? European Law Review 2010;35:326–48.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
124
Niglia L. Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The ‘Social’ Character of Indirect Effect. European Law Journal;16:439–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x
125
Papadopoulos T. Criticising the horizontal direct effect of the EU general principle of equality. European Law Review Published Online First: 2011.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
126
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
127
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
128
Editorial Comments: Horizontal direct effect – A law of diminishing coherence? Common Market Law Review 2006;43:1–8. doi:10.54648/COLA2006001
129
Arnull A. Out with the old... European Law Review 2006;31:1–2.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
130
Jans JH. The Effect in National Legal Systems of the Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Age as a General Principle of Community Law. Legal Issues of Economic Integration 2007;34:53–66.http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=LEIE2007004
131
Masson A, Micheau C. The Werner Mangold Case: An Example of Legal Militancy. European Public Law 2007;13:587–93. doi:10.54648/EURO2007034
132
Craig P. The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions. European Law Review 2009;34.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
133
Thüsing G, Horler S. Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010. Common Market Law Review 2010;47:1161–72.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049
134
Peers S. Supremacy, equality and human rights: comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07). European Law Review 2010;35:849–56.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
135
The scope of application of the general principles of Union law: An ever expanding Union? Common Market Law Review 2010;47:1589–96.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067
136
Muir E. Of ages in – and edges of – EU law. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:39–62.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003
137
Arnull A, Barnard C, Dougan M. Constitutional Order of States?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Bloomsbury Publishing 2011. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=752471&ppg=274
138
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford: : Hart 2011.
139
Drake S. Twenty years after Von Colson: the impact of ‘indirect effect’ on the protection of the individual’s community rights. European Law Review 2005;30:329–48.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
140
Betlem G. The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation: Managing Legal Uncertainty. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies;22:397–418.https://ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600652
141
Craig PP. Directives: direct effect, indirect effect and the construction of national legislation. European Law Review 1997;22.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
142
Figueroa Regueiro PV. Invocability of Substitution and Invocability of Exclusion: Bringing Legal Realism to the Current Developments of the Case-Law of ‘Horizontal’ Direct Effect of Directives. The Jean Monnet Working Papers 2002;7.http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/02/020701.html
143
Niglia L. Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The ‘Social’ Character of Indirect Effect. European Law Journal;16:439–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x
144
Ross M. Beyond Francovich. The Modern Law Review 1993;56:55–73.https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096574
145
Harlow C. Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State. European Law Journal;2:199–225. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.1996.tb00026.x
146
Georgios Anagnostaras. Not as unproblematic as you might think: the establishment of causation in governmental liability actions. European Law Reviewhttp://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
147
Anagnostaras, Georgios. State Liability and Alternative Courses of Action: How Independent Can an Autonomous Remedy Be? Yearbook of European Law 2001;21.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197331?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182
148
Breuer M. State liability for judicial wrongs and Community law: the case of Gerhard Kobler v Austria. European Law Review 2004;29:243–54.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
149
Tison M. Do not attack the watchdog! Banking supervisor’s liability after Peter Paul. Common Market Law Review 2005;42:639–75. doi:10.54648/COLA2005024
150
Roy W. Davis. Liability in damages for a breach of Community law: some reflections on the question of who to sue and the concept of ‘the State’. European Law Review 2006;31.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
151
Cabral P, Chaves MC. Member State Liability for Decisions of National Courts Adjudicating at Last Instance. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2006;:109–26.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/maastje13&id=109
152
Dimitra Nassimpian. ...And we keep on meeting: (de)fragmenting state liability. European Law Review 2007;32.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
153
Havu K. Horizontal Liability for Damages in EU Law-the Changing Relationship of EU and National Law. European Law Journal;18:407–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00606.x
154
Beutler, Björn. State liability for breaches of Community law by national courts: Is the requirement of a manifest infringement of the applicable law an insurmountable obstacle? Common Market Law Review;46:773–804.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033
155
Eilmansberger T. The relationship between rights and remedies in EC law: In search of the missing link. Common Market Law Review;41:1199–246.http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2004049
156
Kilpatrick C, Novitz T, Skidmore P, editors. The future of remedies in Europe. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=1750717
157
Kilpatrick C, Novitz T, Skidmore P. The future of remedies in Europe. Hart 2000.
158
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
159
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
160
Ross M. Effectiveness in the European legal order(s): beyond supremacy to constitutional proportionality? European Law Review 2006;31.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
161
Accetto M, Zleptnig S. The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law. European Public Law 2005;11:375–403.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030
162
Wattel PJ. National Procedural Autonomy and Effectiveness of EC Law: Challenge the Charge, File for Restitution, Sue for Damages? Legal Issues of Economic Integration 2008;35:109–32.
163
Beatson J, Tridimas T, editors. New directions in European public law. Oxford: : Hart Pub 1998. http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1772332
164
Beatson J, Tridimas T, editors. New directions in European public law. Oxford: : Hart Pub 1998.
165
Van Gerven W. Bridging the Unbridgeable: Community and National Tort Laws after Francovich and Brasserie. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;45:507–44.http://www.jstor.org/stable/760680
166
Caranta R. Judicial protection against Member States: a new jus commune takes shape. Common Market law review;32:703–6.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6feecc05-2646-e711-80cb-005056af4099
167
Legrand P. European Legal Systems Are Not Converging. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1996;45:52–81.http://www.jstor.org/stable/761068
168
Granger M-PF. National applications of Francovich and the construction of a European administrative ius commune. European Law Review 2007;32:157–92.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
169
Reich, Norbert. Horizontal liability in EC law: Hybridization of remedies for compensation in case of breaches of EC rights. Common Market Law Review;44:705–42.https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007066
170
Lenaerts, Koen. The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union. Common Market Law Review 2007;44:1625–59.https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007138
171
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
172
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
173
Knocking on Heaven’s Door: Fragmentation, Efficiency and Defiance in the Preliminary Reference Procedure. Common Market Law Review 2010;40:9–50. doi:10.54648/5115417
174
Wattel PJ. Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We can’t go on meeting like this. Common Market Law Review 2004;41:177–90. doi:10.54648/COLA2003075
175
Allott P. Preliminary rulings - another infant disease. European Law Review 2000;25:538–47.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
176
Barents R. Court of Justice in the Draft Constitution, The. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2004;11.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=121&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje11&collection=journals
177
Komarek J. In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review 2007;32:467–91.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
178
Giorgi F, Triart N. National Judges, Community Judges: Invitation to a Journey through the Looking-glass-On the Need for Jurisdictions to Rethink the Inter-systemic Relations beyond the Hierarchical Principle. European Law Journal;14:693–717. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00441.x
179
European Law Journal. ;14.https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/toc/14680386/2008/14/6
180
Rasmussen H. The European Court’s acte clair strategy in CILFIT. European Law Review 1984;9:242–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1086f1b4-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099
181
Mancini GF, Keeling DT. From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge facing the European Court. Yearbook of European law 1991;11:1–13.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d5a4f9a0-dfed-e611-80c9-005056af4099
182
Broberg M. Acte clair revisited: Adapting the acte clair criteria to the demands of the times. Common Market Law Review 2008;45:1383–97.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095
183
Komarek J. In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review 2007;32:467–91.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
184
Arnull A. The Law Lords and the European Union: swimming with the incoming tide. European Law Review 2010;35:57–87.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
185
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
186
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
187
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford [UK]: : Hart Pub 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
188
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart 2011.
189
Greer S, Williams A. Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards ‘Individual’, ‘Constitutional’ or ‘Institutional’ Justice? European Law Journal;15:462–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x
190
Morano-Foadi S, Andreadakis S. Reflections on the Architecture of the EU after the Treaty of Lisbon: The European Judicial Approach to Fundamental Rights. European Law Journal;17:595–610. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00568.x
191
De Witte B. Ch. 27: ‘The past and future role of the European Court of Justice in the protection of Human Rights’ 📖 The EU and human rights. In: Alston P, Bustelo MR, Heenan J, eds. The EU and human rights. Oxford University Press 1999. 859–97.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c5450f90-c93b-e711-80cb-005056af4099
192
Alston P, Weiler JHH. An ‘Ever Closer Union’ in Need of a Human Rights Policy. European Journal of International Law 1998;9:658–723. doi:10.1093/ejil/9.4.658
193
Coppel J, O’Neill A. The European Court of Justice: taking rights seriously? Legal Studies;12:227–39. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.1992.tb00467.x
194
Weiler JHH, Lockhart NJS. "Taking rights seriously” seriously: The European Court and its fundamental rights jurisprudence – part I. Common Market Law Review 1995;32:51–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6d040b1d-2546-e711-80cb-005056af4099
195
Jacobs FG. Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review 2001;26.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
196
Israel De Jesus Butler. Ensuring compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in legislative drafting: the practice of the European Commission. European Law Review 2012;37.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
197
Belling V. Supranational Fundamental Rights or Primacy of Sovereignty? European Law Journal;18:251–68. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x
198
Hepple B. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Industrial Law Journal 2001;30:225–31. doi:10.1093/ilj/30.2.225
199
Jacobs FG. Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review 2001;26.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
200
La Torre M. The Law beneath Rights’ Feet. Preliminary Investigation for a Study of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. European Law Journal;8:515–35. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00163
201
Liisberg JB. Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law? Common Market Law Review 2001;38:1171–99.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=87cfa6a7-68d3-e711-80cd-005056af4099
202
Shuibhne NN. Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law. European Law Review 2009;34:230–56.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
203
Shuibhne NN. The reality of rights: from rhetoric to opt-out. European Law Review 2009;34:815–6.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
204
Ortega L. Fundamental Rights in the European Constitution. European Public Law 2005;11:363–73.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005029
205
Peers S, Ward A, editors. The European Union charter of fundamental rights: politics, law and policy. Hart Publishing 2004.
206
Triantafyllou D. The European Charter of Fundamental Rights and the "Rule of Law’’: Restricting Fundamental Rights by Reference. Common Market Law Review 2002;39:53–64.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/39.1/402757
207
Barnard C, Academy of European Law. The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221
208
Academy of European Law (Florence, Italy). The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://academic.oup.com/book/2907
209
Young AL. The Charter, Constitution and Human Rights: is this the Beginning or the End for Human Rights Protections by Community Law? European Public Law 2005;11:219–40.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.2/EURO2005020
210
Jacqué JP. The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:995–1023.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041
211
Lock T. Walking on a tightrope: The draft ECHR accession agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:1025–54.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042
212
Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH). Report to the Committee of Ministers on the elaboration of legal instruments for the accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights. statewatch: monitoring the state and civil liberties in Europe. 14AD.https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2011/oct/coe-eu-accession-echr-14-10.11.pdf
213
Editorial Comments: Fundamental rights and EU membership: Do as I say, not as I do! Common Market Law Review 2012;49:481–8. doi:10.54648/COLA2012017
214
Von Bogdandy A, Kottmann M, Antpöhler C, et al. Reverse Solange–Protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU Member States. Common Market Law Review 2012;49:489–519.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/49.2/COLA2012018
215
Grimmel A. Judicial Interpretation or Judicial Activism? The Legacy of Rationalism in the Studies of the European Court of Justice. European Law Journal;18:518–35. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00615.x
216
Solanke I. ‘Stop the ECJ’?: An Empirical Analysis of Activism at the Court. European Law Journal;17:764–84. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00561.x
217
Itzcovich G. Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts. European Law Journal;18:358–84. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x
218
Communication department of the European Commission, editor. History of the EU. EUROPA. https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/history-eu_en
219
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
220
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), European Parliament v Council of the European Union. Immigration policy - Right to family reunification of minor children of third country nationals - Directive 2003/86/EC - Protection of fundamental rights - Right to respect for family life - Obligation to have regard to the interests of minor children. 27AD. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?pro=&lgrec=en&nat=or&oqp=&dates=&lg=&language=en&jur=C%2CT%2CF&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&num=C-540%252F03&td=%3BALL&pcs=Oor&avg=&page=1&mat=or&jge=&for=&cid=571183
221
Eleanor Drywood. Giving with one hand, taking with the other: fundamental rights, children and the family reunification decision. European Law Reviewhttp://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
222
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
223
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
224
Craig P. Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;50:72–87. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x
225
Kiiver P. The early-warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: the national parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe. European Law Review 2011;36:98–108.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
226
Conway G. Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union. European Law Journal;17:304–22. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
227
Dinan D. Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission. Journal of Common Market Studies;48:95–118.
228
Hagemann S, Høyland B. Bicameral Politics in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;48:811–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
229
Craig P. The ECJ and ultra vires action: A conceptual analysis. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:395–437. doi:10.54648/COLA2011018
230
Schütze R. Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism? The Cambridge Law Journal 2009;68:525–36. doi:10.1017/S0008197309990183
231
Cygan A. The parliamentarisation of EU decision-making? The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on national parliaments. European Law Review 2011;36:480–99.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
232
Horsley T. Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;50:267–82. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x
233
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
234
Muir E. Of ages in – and edges of – EU law. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:39–62.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003
235
Anthony Arnull. The principle of effective judicial protection in EU law: an unruly horse? European Law Review 2011;36.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
236
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
237
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
238
Thüsing G, Horler S. Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010. Common Market Law Review 2010;10:1161–72.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049
239
Craig P. The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions. European Law Review 2009;34.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
240
Dougan M. When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy. Common Market Law Review 2007;44:931–63.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095
241
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford [UK]: : Hart Pub 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
242
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart 2011.
243
Papadopoulos T. Criticising the horizontal direct effect of the EU general principle of equality. European Law Review Published Online First: 2011.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
244
Peers S. Supremacy, equality and human rights: comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07). European Law Review 2010;35:849–56.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
245
The scope of application of the general principles of Union law: An ever expanding Union? Common Market Law Review 2010;47:1589–96.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067
246
Beutler B. State liability for breaches of Community law by national courts: Is the requirement of a manifest infringement of the applicable law an insurmountable obstacle? Common Market Law Review 2009;46:773–804.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033
247
Adam Cygan. Defining a sufficiently serious breach of Community law: the House of Lords casts its net into the waters. European Law Review 2000;25.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
248
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
249
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
250
Tridimas T. Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down? Common Market Law Review 2001;38:301–32. doi:10.54648/334301
251
Anagnostaras G. Not as unproblematic as you might think: the establishment of causation in governmental liability actions. European Law Review (EL Rev) 2002;27:663–76.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
252
Davis RW. Liability in damages for a breach of Community law: some reflections on the question of who to sue and the concept of ‘the State’. European Law Review 2006;31:69–80.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
253
van Gerven W. Of rights, remedies and procedures. Common Market Law Review 2000;37:501–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f6213619-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099
254
Accetto M, Zleptnig S. The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law. European Public Law 2005;11:375–403.https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030
255
British Institute of International and Comparative Law, Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. Europa Instituut. Common Market Law Review. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=4&values=Journals~~Common+Market+Law+Review
256
Ross M. Effectiveness in the European legal order(s): beyond supremacy to constitutional proportionality? European Law Review 2006;31.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
257
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
258
Komarek J. In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review 2007;32:467–91.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
259
Wattel PJ. Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We can’t go on meeting like this. Common Market Law Review 2004;41:177–90. doi:10.54648/COLA2003075
260
Broberg M. Acte clair revisited: Adapting the acte clair criteria to the demands of the times. Common Market Law Review 2008;45:1383–97.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095
261
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
262
Craig PP, De Búrca G, editors. The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
263
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
264
Greer S, Williams A. Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards ‘Individual’, ‘Constitutional’ or ‘Institutional’ Justice? European Law Journal;15:462–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x
265
Lock T. Walking on a tightrope: The draft ECHR accession agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:1025–54.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042
266
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
267
Dashwood A, Arnull A. A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart 2011.
268
Shuibhne NN. Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law. European Law Review 2009;34:230–56.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
269
Jacobs FG. Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review 2001;26.http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
270
Itzcovich G. Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts. European Law Journal;18:358–84. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x
271
Jacqué JP. The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Common Market Law Review 2011;48:995–1023.https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041
272
Vossestein, Gert-Jan. Cross-Border Transfer of Seat and Conversion of Companies under the EC Treaty Provisions on Freedom of Establishment. European Company Law;6:115–23.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5d2bc332-54f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
273
Berki G. Free movement of patients in the E.U.: a patient’s perspective. [S.l.]: : Intersentia 2018.
274
Neve G de, Prentice R, editors. Unmaking the global sweatshop: health and safety of the world’s garment workers. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5106180
275
Prentice R, Neve G de, editors. Unmaking the global sweatshop: health and safety of the world’s garment workers. Pennsylvania: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2017.
