Academy of European Law (Florence, Italy). (2007a). The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate (C. Barnard, Ed.). Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/2907
Academy of European Law (Florence, Italy). (2007b). The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate (C. Barnard, Ed.). Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/2907
Accetto, M., & Zleptnig, S. (2005a). The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law. European Public Law, 11(3), 375–403. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030
Accetto, M., & Zleptnig, S. (2005b). The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law. European Public Law, 11(3), 375–403. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030
Adam Cygan. (2000). Defining a sufficiently serious breach of Community law: the House of Lords casts its net into the waters. European Law Review, 25(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Allott, P. (2000). Preliminary rulings - another infant disease. European Law Review, 25(5), 538–547. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Alston, P., & Weiler, J. H. H. (1998). An ‘Ever Closer Union’ in Need of a Human Rights Policy. European Journal of International Law, 9, 658–723. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.4.658
Anagnostaras, G. (2002). Not as unproblematic as you might think: the establishment of causation in governmental liability actions. European Law Review (E.L. Rev.), 27(6), 663–676. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Anagnostaras, Georgios. (2001). State Liability and Alternative Courses of Action: How Independent Can an Autonomous Remedy Be? Yearbook of European Law, 21(1). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197331?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182
Anthony Arnull. (2011). The principle of effective judicial protection in EU law: an unruly horse? European Law Review, 36(1). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Arnull, A. (2006). Out with the old... European Law Review, 31(1), 1–2. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Arnull, A. (2010). The Law Lords and the European Union: swimming with the incoming tide. European Law Review, 35(1), 57–87. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Arnull, A., Barnard, C., & Dougan, M. (2011). Constitutional Order of States?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Bloomsbury Publishing. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=752471&ppg=274
Avbelj, M. (n.d.). Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law-(Why) Does it Matter? European Law Journal, 17(6), 744–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00560.x
Avbelj, M. (2011). Theory of European Union. European Law Review, 36(6), 818–836. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Baker, E., & Harding, C. (n.d.). From past imperfect to future perfect? A longitudinal study of the third pillar. European Law Review, 34(1), 25–54. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Bale, T., Hanley, S., & Szczerbiak, A. (n.d.). ‘May Contain Nuts’? The Reality behind the Rhetoric Surrounding the British Conservatives’ New Group in the European Parliament. Political Quarterly, 81(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02067.x
Barber, N. W. (n.d.). The Limited Modesty of Subsidiarity. European Law Journal, 11(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00261.x
BARBER, T. (2010). The Appointments of Herman van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02093.x
Barents, R. (2004). Court of Justice in the Draft Constitution, The. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 11(2). http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=121&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje11&collection=journals
Barents, R. (2010). The Court of Justice after the Treaty of Lisbon. Common Market Law Review, 47(Issue 3), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010031
Barnard, C. (Ed.). (2007a). The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies: Vol. 9: 2006-2007. Hart Pub. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=1772426&ppg=143
Barnard, C. (Ed.). (2007b). The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies: Volume 9: 2006-2007. Hart.
Barnard, C. (2016). The substantive law of the EU: the four freedoms (Fifth edition). Oxford University Press.
Barnard, C. & Academy of European Law. (2007a). The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate: Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221
Barnard, C. & Academy of European Law. (2007b). The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate: Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221
Barnard, C., & Peers, S. (Eds.). (2017). European Union law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Barrett, G. (2008). The king is dead, long live the king": the recasting by the Treaty of Lisbon of the provisions of the Constitutional Treaty concerning national parliaments. European Law Review, 33(1), 66–84. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Beatson, J., & Tridimas, T. (Eds.). (1998a). New directions in European public law. Hart Pub. http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1772332
Beatson, J., & Tridimas, T. (Eds.). (1998b). New directions in European public law. Hart Pub.
Beck, G. (n.d.). The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court, the Primacy of EU Law and the Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: A Conflict between Right and Right in Which There is No Praetor. European Law Journal, 17(4), 470–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00559.x
Belling, V. (n.d.). Supranational Fundamental Rights or Primacy of Sovereignty? European Law Journal, 18(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x
Berki, G. (2018). Free movement of patients in the E.U.: a patient’s perspective. Intersentia.
Betlem, G. (n.d.). The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation: Managing Legal Uncertainty. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(3), 397–418. https://ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600652
Beutler, B. (2009). State liability for breaches of Community law by national courts: Is the requirement of a manifest infringement of the applicable law an insurmountable obstacle? Common Market Law Review, 46(3), 773–804. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033
Beutler, Björn. (n.d.). State liability for breaches of Community law by national courts: Is the requirement of a manifest infringement of the applicable law an insurmountable obstacle? Common Market Law Review, 46(3), 773–804. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033
Breuer, M. (2004). State liability for judicial wrongs and Community law: the case of Gerhard Kobler v Austria. European Law Review, 29(2), 243–254. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
British Institute of International and Comparative Law & Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. Europa Instituut. (n.d.). Common Market Law Review. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=4&values=Journals~~Common+Market+Law+Review
Broberg, M. (2008a). Acte clair revisited: Adapting the acte clair criteria to the demands of the times. Common Market Law Review, 45(5), 1383–1397. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095
Broberg, M. (2008b). Acte clair revisited: Adapting the acte clair criteria to the demands of the times. Common Market Law Review, 45(5), 1383–1397. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095
Büchs, M. (n.d.). How Legitimate is the Open Method of Co-ordination? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(4), 765–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x
Buzek, J. (n.d.). State of the Union: Three Cheers for the Lisbon Treaty and Two Warnings for Political Parties. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02190.x
Cabral, P., & Chaves, M. C. (2006). Member State Liability for Decisions of National Courts Adjudicating at Last Instance. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 13, 109–126. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/maastje13&id=109
Caranta, R. (n.d.). Judicial protection against Member States: a new jus commune takes shape. Common Market Law Review, 32(3), 703–706. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6feecc05-2646-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Cass, D. Z. (n.d.). The Word that Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community. Common Market Law Review, 29(6), 1107–1136. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2fd1d460-0bd1-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Castillo de la Torre, F. (2005). Tribunal Constitucional (Spanish Constitutional Court), Opinion 1/2004 of 13 December 2004, on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. Common Market Law Review, 42(Issue 4), 1169–1202. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005033
Chalmers, D. (2005). Editorial: Constitutional modesty. European Law Review, 30(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Chalmers, D., Davies, G., & Monti, G. (2014). European Union law: text and materials (Third edition). Cambridge University Press.
Communication department of the European Commission (Ed.). (n.d.). History of the EU. EUROPA. https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/history-eu_en
Conway, G. (n.d.-a). Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union. European Law Journal, 17(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
Conway, G. (n.d.-b). Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union. European Law Journal, 17(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
Cooper, I. (n.d.). The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00623.x
Coppel, J., & O’Neill, A. (n.d.). The European Court of Justice: taking rights seriously? Legal Studies, 12(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1992.tb00467.x
Craig, P. (n.d.-a). Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x
Craig, P. (n.d.-b). Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x
Craig, P. (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon, process, architecture and substance. European Law Review, 33(2), 137–166. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Craig, P. (2009a). The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions. European Law Review, 34(3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Craig, P. (2009b). The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions. European Law Review, 34(3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Craig, P. (2009c). The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions. European Law Review, 34(3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Craig, P. (2011a). The ECJ and ultra vires action: A conceptual analysis. Common Market Law Review, 48(2), 395–437. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011018
Craig, P. (2011b). The ECJ and ultra vires action: A conceptual analysis. Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 2), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011018
Craig, P. (2011c). The European Union Act 2011: Locks, limits and legality. Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 6), 1915–1944. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011074
Craig, P. P. (1997). Directives: direct effect, indirect effect and the construction of national legislation. European Law Review, 22(6). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011a). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011b). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011c). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011d). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011e). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011f). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011g). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011h). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011i). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011j). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011k). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011l). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011m). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011n). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011o). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (Eds.). (2011p). The evolution of EU law (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015a). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015b). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015c). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015d). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015e). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015f). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015g). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015h). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P., & De Búrca, G. (2015i). EU law: text, cases, and materials (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.
Crespy, A., & Gajewska, K. (n.d.). New Parliament, New Cleavages after the Eastern Enlargement? The Conflict over the Services Directive as an Opposition between the Liberals and the Regulators. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x
Cygan, A. (2011a). The parliamentarisation of EU decision-making? The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on national parliaments. European Law Review, 36(4), 480–499. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Cygan, A. (2011b). The parliamentarisation of EU decision-making? The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on national parliaments. European Law Review, 36(4), 480–499. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011a). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011b). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011c). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011d). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Pub. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011e). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011f). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Pub. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011g). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011h). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471
Dashwood, A., & Arnull, A. (2011i). A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A., & Wyatt, D. (2011). Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union law (6th ed.). Hart.
Davies, G. (2006). Subsidiarity: The wrong idea, in the wrong place, at the wrong time. Common Market Law Review, 43(Issue 1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005083
Davis, R. W. (2006). Liability in damages for a breach of Community law: some reflections on the question of who to sue and the concept of ‘the State’. European Law Review, 31(1), 69–80. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Dawson, M. (2009). The ambiguity of social Europe in the open method of coordination. European Law Review, 34(1), 55–79. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Dawson, M. (2011). Three waves of new governance in the European Union. European Law Review, 36(2), 208–225. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
de Búrca, G., & Weiler, J. H. H. (Eds.). (2001). The European Court of Justice: Vol. 10/1: The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford University Press.
de León, S. A. (2012). Regions and Subsidiarity in the European Union: A Look at the Role of the Spanish and other Regional Parliaments in the Monitoring of Compliance with the Principle of Subsidiarity. European Public Law, 18(Issue 2), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2012017
de Ruiter, R., & Neuhold, C. (n.d.). Why Is Fast Track the Way to Go? Justifications for Early Agreement in the Co-Decision Procedure and Their Effects. European Law Journal, 18(4), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00617.x
de Waele, H., & Broeksteeg, H. (2012). The semi-permanent European Council Presidency: Some reflections on the law and early practice. Common Market Law Review, 49(Issue 3), 1039–1074. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012038
De Witte, B. (1999). Ch. 27: ‘The past and future role of the European Court of Justice in the protection of Human Rights’ 📖 The EU and human rights. In P. Alston, M. R. Bustelo, & J. Heenan (Eds.), The EU and human rights (pp. 859–897). Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c5450f90-c93b-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Dickson, J. (n.d.). Directives in EU Legal Systems: Whose Norms Are They Anyway? European Law Journal, 17(2), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00544.x
Dimitra Nassimpian. (2007). ...And we keep on meeting: (de)fragmenting state liability. European Law Review, 32(6). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Dinan, D. (n.d.-a). Governance and Institutions: Implementing the Lisbon Treaty in the Shadow of the Euro Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(S1: Special Issue), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02183.x
Dinan, D. (n.d.-b). Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(Suppl 1), 95–118.
Dinan, D. (n.d.-c). Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(Suppl 1), 95–118.
Dinan, D. (n.d.-d). Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(Suppl 1), 95–118.
Dougan, M. (2007a). When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy. Common Market Law Review, 44(4), 931–963. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095
Dougan, M. (2007b). When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy. Common Market Law Review, 44(4), 931–963. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095
Dougan, M. (2007c). When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy. Common Market Law Review, 44(4), 931–963. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095
Drake, S. (2005). Twenty years after Von Colson: the impact of ‘indirect effect’ on the protection of the individual’s community rights. European Law Review, 30(3), 329–348. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Eckes, C. (n.d.). Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order? European Law Journal, 18(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00595.x
Editorial Comments: Delivering justice: Small and bigger steps at the ECJ. (2011). Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 4), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011040
Editorial Comments: Fundamental rights and EU membership: Do as I say, not as I do! (2012). Common Market Law Review, 49(Issue 2), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012017
Editorial Comments: Horizontal direct effect – A law of diminishing coherence? (2006). Common Market Law Review, 43(Issue 1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2006001
Editorial Comments: The post-Lisbon institutional package: Do old habits die hard? (2010). Common Market Law Review, 47(Issue 3), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010027
Eilmansberger, T. (n.d.). The relationship between rights and remedies in EC law: In search of the missing link. Common Market Law Review, 41(5), 1199–1246. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2004049
Eleanor Drywood. (n.d.). Giving with one hand, taking with the other: fundamental rights, children and the family reunification decision. European Law Review. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Emiliou, N. (1994). Subsidiarity: Panacea or fig leaf? 📖 Legal issues of the Maastricht treaty. In Legal issues of the Maastricht treaty (pp. 65–83). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c313c39c-ca3b-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Estella de Noriega, A. (2002). The EU principle of subsidiarity and its critique: Vol. Oxford studies in European law. Oxford University Press.
European Law Journal. (n.d.). 14(6: Special Issue). https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/toc/14680386/2008/14/6
Fairhurst, J. (2016a). Law of the European Union (Eleventh edition). Pearson. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5175070
Fairhurst, J. (2016b). Law of the European Union: Vol. Foundations series (Eleventh). Pearson.
Figueroa Regueiro, P. V. (2002). Invocability of Substitution and Invocability of Exclusion: Bringing Legal Realism to the Current Developments of the Case-Law of ‘Horizontal’ Direct Effect of Directives. The Jean Monnet Working Papers, 7(2). http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/02/020701.html
Foster, N. (Ed.). (n.d.). Blackstone’s EU treaties & legislation 2017-2018: Vol. Blackstone’s statutes (Twenty eighth edition). Oxford University Press.
Georgios Anagnostaras. (n.d.). Not as unproblematic as you might think: the establishment of causation in governmental liability actions. European Law Review. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Giorgi, F., & Triart, N. (n.d.). National Judges, Community Judges: Invitation to a Journey through the Looking-glass-On the Need for Jurisdictions to Rethink the Inter-systemic Relations beyond the Hierarchical Principle. European Law Journal, 14(6), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00441.x
Gordon, M., & Dougan, M. (2012). The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: ‘who won the bloody war anyway?’ European Law Review, 37(1), 3–30. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Granger, M.-P. F. (2007). National applications of Francovich and the construction of a European administrative ius commune. European Law Review, 32(2), 157–192. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Greer, S., & Williams, A. (n.d.-a). Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards ‘Individual’, ‘Constitutional’ or ‘Institutional’ Justice? European Law Journal, 15(4), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x
Greer, S., & Williams, A. (n.d.-b). Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards ‘Individual’, ‘Constitutional’ or ‘Institutional’ Justice? European Law Journal, 15(4), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x
Griller, S. (n.d.). International Law, Human Rights and the Community’s Autonomous Legal Order. European Constitutional Law Review, 4(3), 528–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019608005282
Grimmel, A. (n.d.). Judicial Interpretation or Judicial Activism? The Legacy of Rationalism in the Studies of the European Court of Justice. European Law Journal, 18(4), 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00615.x
Hagemann, S., & Høyland, B. (n.d.-a). Bicameral Politics in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
Hagemann, S., & Høyland, B. (n.d.-b). Bicameral Politics in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
Hagemann, S., & Høyland, B. (n.d.-c). Bicameral Politics in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
Harlow, C. (n.d.). Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State. European Law Journal, 2(3), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1996.tb00026.x
Harpaz, G. (2011). European Integration in the Aftermath of the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon: Quo Vadis? European Public Law, 17(1), 73–89. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2011007
Hartley, T. C. (1999). Constitutional problems of the European Union. Hart.
Hartley, T. C. (2014). The foundations of European Union law: an introduction to the constitutional and administrative law of the European Union (Eighth). Oxford University Press.
Hatzopoulos, V. (n.d.). Why the Open Method of Coordination Is Bad For You: A Letter to the EU. European Law Journal, 13(3), 309–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00368.x
Havu, K. (n.d.). Horizontal Liability for Damages in EU Law-the Changing Relationship of EU and National Law. European Law Journal, 18(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00606.x
Hepple, B. (2001). The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Industrial Law Journal, 30(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/30.2.225
Herdegen, M. (1994). Maastricht and the German Constitutional Court: Constitutional Restraints for an "Ever Closer Union” and Document "Extracts from: Brunner v. The European Union Treaty (Bundesverfassungsgericht). Common Market Law Review, 31(2), 235–262. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4e45a038-b213-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Héritier, A. (n.d.). Institutional Change in Europe: Co-decision and Comitology Transformed. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02226.x
Herlin-Karnell, E. (2008). The Ship–Source Pollution Case C–440/05, Commission v. Council , Judgment of 23 October 2007 (Grand Chamber). European Public Law, 14(Issue 4), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2008036
Hilson, C., & Downes, T. A. (1999). Making sense of rights: Community rights in E.C. law. European Law Review, 24(2). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Hinarejos, A. (2011). Integration in criminal matters and the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review, 36(3), 420–430. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Horsley, T. (n.d.-a). Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x
Horsley, T. (n.d.-b). Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x
Isiksel, N. T. (n.d.). Fundamental rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat. European Law Journal, 16(5), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x
Israel De Jesus Butler. (2012). Ensuring compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in legislative drafting: the practice of the European Commission. European Law Review, 37(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Itzcovich, G. (n.d.-a). Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts. European Law Journal, 18(3), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x
Itzcovich, G. (n.d.-b). Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts. European Law Journal, 18(3), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x
Itzcovich, G. (n.d.-c). Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts. European Law Journal, 18(3), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x
Jacobs, F. G. (2001a). Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review, 26(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Jacobs, F. G. (2001b). Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review, 26(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Jacobs, F. G. (2001c). Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review, 26(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Jacobs, F. G., Arnull, A., Eeckhout, P., & Tridimas, T. (2008). Continuity and change in EU law: essays in honour of Sir Francis Jacobs. Oxford University Press. http://eu01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=10395381120002461&institutionId=2461&customerId=2460
Jacqué, J. P. (2011a). The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Common Market Law Review, 48(4), 995–1023. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041
Jacqué, J. P. (2011b). The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Common Market Law Review, 48(4), 995–1023. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041
Jans, J. H. (2007). The Effect in National Legal Systems of the Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Age as a General Principle of Community Law. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 34(1), 53–66. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=LEIE2007004
Immigration policy - Right to family reunification of minor children of third country nationals - Directive 2003/86/EC - Protection of fundamental rights - Right to respect for family life - Obligation to have regard to the interests of minor children, CURIA - Home - Court of Justice of the European Union ___ (27 C.E.). http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?pro=&lgrec=en&nat=or&oqp=&dates=&lg=&language=en&jur=C%2CT%2CF&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&num=C-540%252F03&td=%3BALL&pcs=Oor&avg=&page=1&mat=or&jge=&for=&cid=571183
Kiiver, P. (n.d.). The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court: A Court-Ordered Strengthening of the National Legislature in the EU. European Law Journal, 16(5), 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00523.x
Kiiver, P. (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon, The National Parliaments and the Principle of Subsidiarity. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15(1), 77–84. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=77&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje15&collection=journals
Kiiver, P. (2011a). The early-warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: the national parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe. European Law Review, 36(1), 98–108. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Kiiver, P. (2011b). The early-warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: the national parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe. European Law Review, 36(1), 98–108. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T., & Skidmore, P. (Eds.). (2000a). The future of remedies in Europe. Hart Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=1750717
Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T., & Skidmore, P. (2000b). The future of remedies in Europe. Hart.
Klamert, M. (n.d.-a). Conflicts of legal basis: No legality and no basis but a bright future under the lisbon treaty? European Law Review, 35(4), 497–515. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Klamert, M. (n.d.-b). Conflicts of legal basis: No legality and no basis but a bright future under the lisbon treaty? European Law Review, 35(4), 497–515. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Knocking on Heaven’s Door: Fragmentation, Efficiency and Defiance in the Preliminary Reference Procedure. (2010). Common Market Law Review, 40(Issue 1), 9–50. https://doi.org/10.54648/5115417
Komarek, J. (2007a). In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review, 32(4), 467–491. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Komarek, J. (2007b). In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review, 32(4), 467–491. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Komarek, J. (2007c). In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review, 32(4), 467–491. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Konig, T., & Junge, D. (n.d.). Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power? European Union Politics, 10(4), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509346780
Koutrakos, P. (2011). The Court of Justice as the guardian of national courts - or not? European Law Review, 36(3), 319–320. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Kumm, M. (n.d.). The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty. European Law Journal, 11(3), 262–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00260.x
Kunoy, B., & Dawes, A. (2009). Plate tectonics in Luxembourg: The ménage à trois between EC law, international law and the European Convention on Human Rights following the UN sanctions cases. Common Market Law Review, 46(Issue 1), 73–104. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2009003
La Torre, M. (n.d.). The Law beneath Rights’ Feet. Preliminary Investigation for a Study of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. European Law Journal, 8(4), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00163
Leczykiewicz, D. (2010). ‘Effective judicial protection’ of human rights after Lisbon: should national courts be empowered to review EU secondary law? European Law Review, 35(3), 326–348. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Legrand, P. (1996). European Legal Systems Are Not Converging. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45(1), 52–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/761068
Lenaerts, K., & Corthaut, T. (2006). Of birds and hedges: the role of primacy in invoking norms of EU law. European Law Review, 31(3), 287–315. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Lenaerts, Koen. (2007). The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 44(6), 1625–1659. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007138
Liisberg, J. B. (2001). Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law? Common Market Law Review, 38(5), 1171–1199. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=87cfa6a7-68d3-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Lock, T. (2011a). Taking national courts more seriously? Comment on Opinion 1/09. European Law Review, 36(4), 576–588. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Lock, T. (2011b). Walking on a tightrope: The draft ECHR accession agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order. Common Market Law Review, 48(4), 1025–1054. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042
Lock, T. (2011c). Walking on a tightrope: The draft ECHR accession agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order. Common Market Law Review, 48(4), 1025–1054. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042
MacCormick, N. (n.d.). Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review, 56(1), 1–18. https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096572
Mancini, G. F., & Keeling, D. T. (1991). From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge facing the European Court. Yearbook of European Law, 11, 1–13. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d5a4f9a0-dfed-e611-80c9-005056af4099
Masson, A., & Micheau, C. (2007). The Werner Mangold Case: An Example of Legal Militancy. European Public Law, 13(Issue 4), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2007034
Mikko, M. (2008). Unveiling the Council of the European Union | Ch 2: ‘Voting and coalitions in the Council after Enlargement’. In D. Naurin & H. Wallace (Eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: games governments play in Brussels (pp. 23–35). Palgrave Macmillan. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ab345e06-b313-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Mitsilegas, V. (2009). The third wave of third pillar law. Which direction for EU criminal justice? European Law Review, 34(4), 523–560. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Morano-Foadi, S., & Andreadakis, S. (n.d.). Reflections on the Architecture of the EU after the Treaty of Lisbon: The European Judicial Approach to Fundamental Rights. European Law Journal, 17(5), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00568.x
Muir, E. (2011a). Of ages in – and edges of – EU law. Common Market Law Review, 48(1), 39–62. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003
Muir, E. (2011b). Of ages in – and edges of – EU law. Common Market Law Review, 48(1), 39–62. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003
Neve, G. de, & Prentice, R. (Eds.). (2017). Unmaking the global sweatshop: health and safety of the world’s garment workers. University of Pennsylvania Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5106180
Neyer, J. (n.d.). Justice, Not Democracy: Legitimacy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02079.x
Niglia, L. (n.d.-a). Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The ‘Social’ Character of Indirect Effect. European Law Journal, 16(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x
Niglia, L. (n.d.-b). Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The ‘Social’ Character of Indirect Effect. European Law Journal, 16(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x
Ortega, L. (2005). Fundamental Rights in the European Constitution. European Public Law, 11(Issue 3), 363–373. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005029
Papadopoulos, T. (2011a). Criticising the horizontal direct effect of the EU general principle of equality. European Law Review, 4. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Papadopoulos, T. (2011b). Criticising the horizontal direct effect of the EU general principle of equality. European Law Review, 4. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Payandeh, M. (2011). Constitutional review of EU law after Honeywell : Contextualizing the relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011002
Peers, S. (2008). The European Community’s criminal law competence: the plot thickens. European Law Review, 33(3), 399–410. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Peers, S. (2010a). Supremacy, equality and human rights: comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07). European Law Review, 35(6), 849–856. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Peers, S. (2010b). Supremacy, equality and human rights: comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07). European Law Review, 35(6), 849–856. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Peers, S., & Ward, A. (Eds.). (2004). The European Union charter of fundamental rights: politics, law and policy: Vol. Essays in European law. Hart Publishing.
Pliakos, A., & Anagnostaras, G. (2011). Who is the ultimate arbiter? The battle over judicial supremacy in EU law. European Law Review, 36(1), 109–123. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Prentice, R., & Neve, G. de (Eds.). (2017). Unmaking the global sweatshop: health and safety of the world’s garment workers. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Quénivet, N. N. R., & Dadomo, C. (2020). European Union law (Third edition). Hall & Stott Publishing.
Rasmussen, H. (1984). The European Court’s acte clair strategy in CILFIT. European Law Review, 9, 242–259. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1086f1b4-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Rawlings, R. (n.d.-a). Legal politics: the United Kingdom and ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 1. Public Law, 254–278. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Rawlings, R. (n.d.-b). Legal politics: the United Kingdom and ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 2. Public Law, 367–391. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Reich, Norbert. (n.d.). Horizontal liability in EC law: Hybridization of remedies for compensation in case of breaches of EC rights. Common Market Law Review, 44(3), 705–742. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007066
Rittberger, B. (n.d.). Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02225.x
Ross, M. (1993). Beyond Francovich. The Modern Law Review, 56(1), 55–73. https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096574
Ross, M. (2006a). Effectiveness in the European legal order(s): beyond supremacy to constitutional proportionality? European Law Review, 31(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Ross, M. (2006b). Effectiveness in the European legal order(s): beyond supremacy to constitutional proportionality? European Law Review, 31(4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Roy W. Davis. (2006). Liability in damages for a breach of Community law: some reflections on the question of who to sue and the concept of ‘the State’. European Law Review, 31(1). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Sabel, C. F., & Gerstenberg, O. (n.d.). Constitutionalising an Overlapping Consensus: The ECJ and the Emergence of a Coordinate Constitutional Order. European Law Journal, 16(5), 511–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00521.x
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (n.d.). Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14(3), 271–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x
Schutze, R. (2007). Dual federalism constitutionalised: the emergence of exclusive competences in the EC legal order. European Law Review, 32(1). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Schütze, R. (2009a). Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism? The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309990183
Schütze, R. (2009b). Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism? The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309990183
Schütze, R. (2015). European Union law. Cambridge University Press.
Schütze, R. (2016). European constitutional law (Second edition). Cambridge University Press.
Scicluna, N. (n.d.). When Failure isn’t Failure: European Union Constitutionalism after the Lisbon Treaty. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02239.x
Shore, C. (n.d.). ‘European Governance’ or Governmentality? The European Commission and the Future of Democratic Government. European Law Journal, 17(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00551.x
Shuibhne, N. N. (2009a). Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law. European Law Review, 34(2), 230–256. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Shuibhne, N. N. (2009b). Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law. European Law Review, 34(2), 230–256. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Shuibhne, N. N. (2009c). The reality of rights: from rhetoric to opt-out. European Law Review, 34(6), 815–816. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Solanke, I. (n.d.). ‘Stop the ECJ’?: An Empirical Analysis of Activism at the Court. European Law Journal, 17(6), 764–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00561.x
Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH). (14 C.E.). Report to the Committee of Ministers on the elaboration of legal instruments for the accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights. In statewatch: monitoring the state and civil liberties in Europe (Issue CDDH(2011)009). Council of Europe. https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2011/oct/coe-eu-accession-echr-14-10.11.pdf
Szyszczak, E. (n.d.). Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination. European Law Journal, 12(4), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00329.x
The scope of application of the general principles of Union law: An ever expanding Union? (2010a). Common Market Law Review, 47(6), 1589–1596. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067
The scope of application of the general principles of Union law: An ever expanding Union? (2010b). Common Market Law Review, 47(6), 1589–1596. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067
Thüsing, G., & Horler, S. (2010a). Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010. Common Market Law Review, 47(4), 1161–1172. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049
Thüsing, G., & Horler, S. (2010b). Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010. Common Market Law Review, 10(4), 1161–1172. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049
Thym, D. (2009). In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon judgment of the German Constitutional Court. Common Market Law Review, 46(Issue 6), 1795–1822. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2009074
Tison, M. (2005). Do not attack the watchdog! Banking supervisor’s liability after Peter Paul. Common Market Law Review, 42(Issue 3), 639–675. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005024
Toth, A. G. (1994). Is subsidiarity justiciable? European Law Review, 19(3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law
Triantafyllou, D. (2002). The European Charter of Fundamental Rights and the "Rule of Law’’: Restricting Fundamental Rights by Reference. Common Market Law Review, 39(1), 53–64. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/39.1/402757
Tridimas, T. (2001a). Black, White, and Shades of Grey: Horizontality of Directives Revisited. Yearbook of European Law, 21(1), 327–354. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197523?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182
Tridimas, T. (2001b). Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down? Common Market Law Review, 38(Issue 2), 301–332. https://doi.org/10.54648/334301
Tridimas, T. (2006). The general principles of EU law: Vol. Oxford EC law library (Second). Oxford University Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip068/2006005363.html
Tridimas, T. (2015). The general principles of EU law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (n.d.). Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination. European Law Journal, 11(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x
Van Gerven, W. (n.d.). Bridging the Unbridgeable: Community and National Tort Laws after Francovich and Brasserie. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45(3), 507–544. http://www.jstor.org/stable/760680
van Gerven, W. (2000). Of rights, remedies and procedures. Common Market Law Review, 37(3), 501–536. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f6213619-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Von Bogdandy, A., Kottmann, M., Antpöhler, C., Dickschen, J., Hentrei, S., & Smrkolj, M. (2012). Reverse Solange–Protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU Member States. Common Market Law Review, 49(2), 489–519. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/49.2/COLA2012018
von Bogdandy, A., & Schill, S. W. (2011). Overcoming absolute primacy: Respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 5), 1417–1453. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011057
von der Groeben, C. (n.d.). Aida Torres Perez. Conflicts of Rights in the European Union. A Theory of Supranational Adjudication. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr017
Vossestein, Gert-Jan. (n.d.). Cross-Border Transfer of Seat and Conversion of Companies under the EC Treaty Provisions on Freedom of Establishment. European Company Law, 6(3), 115–123. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5d2bc332-54f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Walker, N. (n.d.). The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Review, 65(3), 317–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00383
Ward, I. (2009). A critical introduction to European law: Vol. The law in context series (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Wattel, P. J. (2004a). Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We can’t go on meeting like this. Common Market Law Review, 41(Issue 1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2003075
Wattel, P. J. (2004b). Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We can’t go on meeting like this. Common Market Law Review, 41(Issue 1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2003075
Wattel, P. J. (2008). National Procedural Autonomy and Effectiveness of EC Law: Challenge the Charge, File for Restitution, Sue for Damages? Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 35(2), 109–132.
Weatherill, S. (2016). Cases and materials on EU law (Twelfth edition). Oxford University Press.
Weiler, J. H. H. (n.d.). Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision. European Law Journal, 1(3), 219–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00030.x
Weiler, J. H. H., & Lockhart, N. J. S. (1995). "Taking rights seriously” seriously: The European Court and its fundamental rights jurisprudence – part I. Common Market Law Review, 32(1), 51–94. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6d040b1d-2546-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Woods, L., Watson, P., Costa, M., & Steiner, J. (2017). Steiner & Woods EU law (Thirteenth edition). Oxford University Press.
Young, A. L. (2005). The Charter, Constitution and Human Rights: is this the Beginning or the End for Human Rights Protections by Community Law? European Public Law, 11(2), 219–240. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.2/EURO2005020
Zbíral, R. (2012). Czech Constitutional Court, judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12. A Legal revolution or negligible episode? Court of Justice decision proclaimed ultra vires. Common Market Law Review, 49(Issue 4), 1475–1491. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012072
Ziller, J. (2010). The German Constitutional Court’s Friendliness towards European Law: On the Judgment of Bundesverfassungsgericht over the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon. European Public Law, 16(Issue 1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2010004
