Bibliography for Law and Policy of the European Union advanced - M3031 - Nuno Ferreira (Aut / Spr) BETA

Academy of European Law (Florence, Italy). 2007a. The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited: Assessing the Impact of the Constitutional Debate. Edited by Catherine Barnard. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/2907.

———. 2007b. The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited: Assessing the Impact of the Constitutional Debate. Edited by Catherine Barnard. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/2907.

Accetto, Matej, and Stefan Zleptnig. 2005a. ‘The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law’. European Public Law 11 (3): 375–403. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030.

———. 2005b. ‘The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law’. European Public Law 11 (3): 375–403. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030.

Adam Cygan. 2000. ‘Defining a Sufficiently Serious Breach of Community Law: The House of Lords Casts Its Net into the Waters’. European Law Review 25 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Allott, Philip. 2000. ‘Preliminary Rulings - Another Infant Disease’. European Law Review 25 (5): 538–47. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Alston, Philip, and J H H Weiler. 1998. ‘An “Ever  Closer  Union”  in  Need of  a  Human  Rights  Policy’. European Journal of International Law 9: 658–723. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.4.658.

Anagnostaras, Georgios. 2001. ‘State Liability and Alternative Courses of Action: How Independent Can an Autonomous Remedy Be?’ Yearbook of European Law 21 (1). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197331?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182.

Anagnostaras, Georgios. 2002. ‘Not as Unproblematic as You Might Think: The Establishment of Causation in Governmental Liability Actions’. European Law Review (E.L. Rev.) 27 (6): 663–76. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Anthony Arnull. 2011. ‘The Principle of Effective Judicial Protection in EU Law: An Unruly Horse?’ European Law Review 36 (1). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Arnull, Anthony. 2006. ‘Out with the Old...’ European Law Review 31 (1): 1–2. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2010. ‘The Law Lords and the European Union: Swimming with the Incoming Tide’. European Law Review 35 (1): 57–87. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Arnull, Anthony, Catherine Barnard, and Michael Dougan. 2011. Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Bloomsbury Publishing. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=752471&ppg=274.

Avbelj, Matej. 2011. ‘Theory of European Union’. European Law Review 36 (6): 818–36. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. n.d. ‘Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law-(Why) Does It Matter?’ European Law Journal 17 (6): 744–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00560.x.

Baker, Estella, and Christopher Harding. n.d. ‘From Past Imperfect to Future Perfect? A Longitudinal Study of the Third Pillar’. European Law Review 34 (1): 25–54. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Bale, Tim, Seán Hanley, and Aleks Szczerbiak. n.d. ‘“May Contain Nuts”? The Reality behind the Rhetoric Surrounding the British Conservatives’ New Group in the European Parliament’. Political Quarterly 81 (1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02067.x.

Barber, N W. n.d. ‘The Limited Modesty of Subsidiarity’. European Law Journal 11 (3): 308–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00261.x.

BARBER, TONY. 2010. ‘The Appointments of Herman van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (September): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02093.x.

Barents, René. 2004. ‘Court of Justice in the Draft Constitution, The’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 11 (2). http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=121&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje11&collection=journals.

———. 2010. ‘The Court of Justice after the Treaty of Lisbon’. Common Market Law Review 47 (Issue 3): 709–28. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010031.

Barnard, Catherine, ed. 2007a. The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies: Vol. 9: 2006-2007. Oxford: Hart Pub. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=1772426&ppg=143.

———, ed. 2007b. The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies: Volume 9: 2006-2007. Oxford: Hart.

———. 2016. The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Barnard, Catherine and Academy of European Law. 2007a. The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited: Assessing the Impact of the Constitutional Debate. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221.

———. 2007b. The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited: Assessing the Impact of the Constitutional Debate. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221.

Barnard, Catherine, and Steve Peers, eds. 2017. European Union Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barrett, Gavin. 2008. ‘The King Is Dead, Long Live the King": The Recasting by the Treaty of Lisbon of the Provisions of the Constitutional Treaty Concerning National Parliaments’. European Law Review 33 (1): 66–84. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Beatson, J., and Takis Tridimas, eds. 1998a. New Directions in European Public Law. Oxford: Hart Pub. http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1772332.

———, eds. 1998b. New Directions in European Public Law. Oxford: Hart Pub.

Beck, Gunnar. n.d. ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court, the Primacy of EU Law and the Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: A Conflict between Right and Right in Which There Is No Praetor’. European Law Journal 17 (4): 470–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00559.x.

Belling, Vojtech. n.d. ‘Supranational Fundamental Rights or Primacy of Sovereignty?’ European Law Journal 18 (2): 251–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x.

Berki, Gabriella. 2018. Free Movement of Patients in the E.U.: A Patient’s Perspective. [S.l.]: Intersentia.

Betlem, Gerrit. n.d. ‘The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation: Managing Legal Uncertainty’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (3): 397–418. https://ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600652.

Beutler, Björn. 2009. ‘State Liability for Breaches of Community Law by National Courts: Is the Requirement of a Manifest Infringement of the Applicable Law an Insurmountable Obstacle?’ Common Market Law Review 46 (3): 773–804. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033.

Beutler, Björn. n.d. ‘State Liability for Breaches of Community Law by National Courts: Is the Requirement of a Manifest Infringement of the Applicable Law an Insurmountable Obstacle?’ Common Market Law Review 46 (3): 773–804. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033.

Bogdandy, Armin von, and Stephan W. Schill. 2011. ‘Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty’. Common Market Law Review 48 (Issue 5): 1417–53. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011057.

Breuer, Marten. 2004. ‘State Liability for Judicial Wrongs and Community Law: The Case of Gerhard Kobler v Austria’. European Law Review 29 (2): 243–54. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

British Institute of International and Comparative Law and Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. Europa Instituut. n.d. ‘Common Market Law Review’. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=4&values=Journals~~Common+Market+Law+Review.

Broberg, Morten. 2008a. ‘Acte Clair Revisited: Adapting the Acte Clair Criteria to the Demands of the Times’. Common Market Law Review 45 (5): 1383–97. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095.

———. 2008b. ‘Acte Clair Revisited: Adapting the Acte Clair Criteria to the Demands of the Times’. Common Market Law Review 45 (5): 1383–97. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095.

Büchs, Milena. n.d. ‘How Legitimate Is the Open Method of Co-Ordination?’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (4): 765–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x.

Búrca, Gráinne de, and Joseph H H Weiler, eds. 2001. The European Court of Justice. Vol. 10/1: The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford University Press.

Buzek, Jerzy. n.d. ‘State of the Union: Three Cheers for the Lisbon Treaty and Two Warnings for Political Parties’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02190.x.

Cabral, Pedro, and Mariana C Chaves. 2006. ‘Member State Liability for Decisions of National Courts Adjudicating at Last Instance’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, no. 13: 109–26. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/maastje13&id=109.

Caranta, Roberto. n.d. ‘Judicial Protection against Member States: A New Jus Commune Takes Shape’. Common Market Law Review 32 (3): 703–6. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6feecc05-2646-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Cass, Deborah Z. n.d. ‘The Word That Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community’. Common Market Law Review 29 (6): 1107–36. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2fd1d460-0bd1-e711-80cd-005056af4099.

Castillo de la Torre, Fernando. 2005. ‘Tribunal Constitucional (Spanish Constitutional Court), Opinion 1/2004 of 13 December 2004, on the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe’. Common Market Law Review 42 (Issue 4): 1169–1202. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005033.

Chalmers, Damian. 2005. ‘Editorial: Constitutional Modesty’. European Law Review 30 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Chalmers, Damian, Gareth Davies, and Giorgio Monti. 2014. European Union Law: Text and Materials. Third edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Communication department of the European Commission, ed. n.d. ‘History of the EU’. EUROPA. https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/history-eu_en.

Conway, Gerard. n.d. ‘Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union’. European Law Journal 17 (3): 304–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x.

———. n.d. ‘Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union’. European Law Journal 17 (3): 304–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x.

Cooper, Ian. n.d. ‘The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (2): 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00623.x.

Coppel, Jason, and Aidan O’Neill. n.d. ‘The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’ Legal Studies 12 (2): 227–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1992.tb00467.x.

Craig, P. P., and G. De Búrca, eds. 2011a. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011b. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2011c. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011d. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2011e. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011f. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2011g. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011h. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2011i. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011j. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2011k. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011l. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2011m. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011n. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2011o. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.

———, eds. 2011p. The Evolution of EU Law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015a. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015b. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015c. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015d. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015e. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015f. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Craig, Paul. 2008. ‘The Treaty of Lisbon, Process, Architecture and Substance’. European Law Review 33 (2): 137–66. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2009a. ‘The Legal Effect of Directives: Policy, Rules and Exceptions’. European Law Review 34 (3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2009b. ‘The Legal Effect of Directives: Policy, Rules and Exceptions’. European Law Review 34 (3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2009c. ‘The Legal Effect of Directives: Policy, Rules and Exceptions’. European Law Review 34 (3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2011a. ‘The ECJ and Ultra Vires Action: A Conceptual Analysis’. Common Market Law Review 48 (2): 395–437. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011018.

———. 2011b. ‘The ECJ and Ultra Vires Action: A Conceptual Analysis’. Common Market Law Review 48 (Issue 2): 395–437. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011018.

———. 2011c. ‘The European Union Act 2011: Locks, Limits and Legality’. Common Market Law Review 48 (Issue 6): 1915–44. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011074.

———. n.d. ‘Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x.

———. n.d. ‘Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x.

Craig, Paul P. 1997. ‘Directives: Direct Effect, Indirect Effect and the Construction of National Legislation’. European Law Review 22 (6). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Craig, Paul P, and Gráinne De Búrca. 2015a. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015b. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2015c. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Crespy, Amandine, and Katarzyna Gajewska. n.d. ‘New Parliament, New Cleavages after the Eastern Enlargement? The Conflict over the Services Directive as an Opposition between the Liberals and the Regulators’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (5): 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x.

Cygan, Adam. 2011a. ‘The Parliamentarisation of EU Decision-Making? The Impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on National Parliaments’. European Law Review 36 (4): 480–99. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2011b. ‘The Parliamentarisation of EU Decision-Making? The Impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on National Parliaments’. European Law Review 36 (4): 480–99. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Dashwood, Alan, and Anthony Arnull. 2011a. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.

———. 2011b. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.

———. 2011c. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford: Hart.

———. 2011d. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford [UK]: Hart Pub. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.

———. 2011e. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.

———. 2011f. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford [UK]: Hart Pub. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.

———. 2011g. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.

———. 2011h. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.

———. 2011i. A Constitutional Order of States?: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.

Dashwood, Alan, and Derrick Wyatt. 2011. Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union Law. 6th ed. Hart.

Davies, Gareth. 2006. ‘Subsidiarity: The Wrong Idea, in the Wrong Place, at the Wrong Time’. Common Market Law Review 43 (Issue 1): 63–84. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005083.

Davis, Roy W. 2006. ‘Liability in Damages for a Breach of Community Law: Some Reflections on the Question of Who to Sue and the Concept of “the State”’. European Law Review 31 (1): 69–80. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Dawson, Mark. 2009. ‘The Ambiguity of Social Europe in the Open Method of Coordination’. European Law Review 34 (1): 55–79. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2011. ‘Three Waves of New Governance in the European Union’. European Law Review 36 (2): 208–25. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

De Witte, Bruno. 1999. ‘Ch. 27: “The Past and Future Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Human Rights” 📖 The EU and Human Rights’. In The EU and Human Rights, edited by Philip Alston, Mara R Bustelo, and James Heenan, 859–97. Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c5450f90-c93b-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Dickson, Julie. n.d. ‘Directives in EU Legal Systems: Whose Norms Are They Anyway?’ European Law Journal 17 (2): 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00544.x.

Dimitra Nassimpian. 2007. ...‘...And We Keep on Meeting: (De)Fragmenting State Liability’. European Law Review 32 (6). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Dinan, Desmond. n.d. ‘Governance and Institutions: Implementing the Lisbon Treaty in the Shadow of the Euro Crisis’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (S1: Special Issue): 103–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02183.x.

———. n.d. ‘Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission’. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (Suppl 1): 95–118.

———. n.d. ‘Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission’. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (Suppl 1): 95–118.

———. n.d. ‘Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission’. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (Suppl 1): 95–118.

Dougan, Michael. 2007a. ‘When Worlds Collide! Competing Visions of the Relationship between Direct Effect and Supremacy’. Common Market Law Review 44 (4): 931–63. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095.

———. 2007b. ‘When Worlds Collide! Competing Visions of the Relationship between Direct Effect and Supremacy’. Common Market Law Review 44 (4): 931–63. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095.

———. 2007c. ‘When Worlds Collide! Competing Visions of the Relationship between Direct Effect and Supremacy’. Common Market Law Review 44 (4): 931–63. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095.

Drake, Sara. 2005. ‘Twenty Years after Von Colson: The Impact of “Indirect Effect” on the Protection of the Individual’s Community Rights’. European Law Review 30 (3): 329–48. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Eckes, Christina. n.d. ‘Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order?’ European Law Journal 18 (2): 230–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00595.x.

‘Editorial Comments: Delivering Justice: Small and Bigger Steps at the ECJ’. 2011. Common Market Law Review 48 (Issue 4): 987–93. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011040.

‘Editorial Comments: Fundamental Rights and EU Membership: Do as I Say, Not as I Do!’ 2012. Common Market Law Review 49 (Issue 2): 481–88. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012017.

‘Editorial Comments: Horizontal Direct Effect – A Law of Diminishing Coherence?’ 2006. Common Market Law Review 43 (Issue 1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2006001.

‘Editorial Comments: The Post-Lisbon Institutional Package: Do Old Habits Die Hard?’ 2010. Common Market Law Review 47 (Issue 3): 597–604. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010027.

Eilmansberger, Thomas. n.d. ‘The Relationship between Rights and Remedies in EC Law: In Search of the Missing Link’. Common Market Law Review 41 (5): 1199–1246. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2004049.

Eleanor Drywood. n.d. ‘Giving with One Hand, Taking with the Other: Fundamental Rights, Children and the Family Reunification Decision’. European Law Review. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Emiliou, N. 1994. ‘Subsidiarity: Panacea or Fig Leaf? 📖 Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty’. In Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty, 65–83. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c313c39c-ca3b-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Estella de Noriega, Antonio. 2002. The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and Its Critique. Vol. Oxford studies in European law. Oxford University Press.

‘European Law Journal’. n.d. 14 (6: Special Issue). https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/toc/14680386/2008/14/6.

Fairhurst, John. 2016a. Law of the European Union. Eleventh edition. New York: Pearson. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5175070.

———. 2016b. Law of the European Union. Eleventh. Vol. Foundations series. New York, N.Y.: Pearson.

Figueroa Regueiro, Pablo V. 2002. ‘Invocability of Substitution and Invocability of Exclusion: Bringing Legal Realism to the Current Developments of the Case-Law of “Horizontal” Direct Effect of Directives’. The Jean Monnet Working Papers 7 (2). http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/02/020701.html.

Foster, Nigel, ed. n.d. Blackstone’s EU Treaties & Legislation 2017-2018. Twenty eighth edition. Vol. Blackstone’s statutes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Georgios Anagnostaras. n.d. ‘Not as Unproblematic as You Might Think: The Establishment of Causation in Governmental Liability Actions’. European Law Review. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Gerven, W van. 2000. ‘Of Rights, Remedies and Procedures’. Common Market Law Review 37 (3): 501–36. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f6213619-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Giorgi, Florence, and Nicolas Triart. n.d. ‘National Judges, Community Judges: Invitation to a Journey through the Looking-Glass-On the Need for Jurisdictions to Rethink the Inter-Systemic Relations beyond the Hierarchical Principle’. European Law Journal 14 (6): 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00441.x.

Gordon, Michael, and Michael Dougan. 2012. ‘The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: “Who Won the Bloody War Anyway?”’ European Law Review 37 (1): 3–30. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Granger, Marie-Pierre F. 2007. ‘National Applications of Francovich and the Construction of a European Administrative Ius Commune’. European Law Review 32 (2): 157–92. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Greer, Steven, and Andrew Williams. n.d. ‘Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards “Individual”, “Constitutional” or “Institutional” Justice?’ European Law Journal 15 (4): 462–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x.

———. n.d. ‘Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards “Individual”, “Constitutional” or “Institutional” Justice?’ European Law Journal 15 (4): 462–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x.

Griller, Stefan. n.d. ‘International Law, Human Rights and the Community’s Autonomous Legal Order’. European Constitutional Law Review 4 (3): 528–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019608005282.

Grimmel, Andreas. n.d. ‘Judicial Interpretation or Judicial Activism? The Legacy of Rationalism in the Studies of the European Court of Justice’. European Law Journal 18 (4): 518–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00615.x.

Groeben, Constantin von der. n.d. ‘Aida Torres Perez. Conflicts of Rights in the European Union. A Theory of Supranational Adjudication’. European Journal of International Law 22 (1): 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr017.

Hagemann, Sara, and Bjørn Høyland. n.d. ‘Bicameral Politics in the European Union’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 811–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x.

———. n.d. ‘Bicameral Politics in the European Union’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 811–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x.

———. n.d. ‘Bicameral Politics in the European Union’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 811–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x.

Harlow, Carol. n.d. ‘Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State’. European Law Journal 2 (3): 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1996.tb00026.x.

Harpaz, Guy. 2011. ‘European Integration in the Aftermath of the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon: Quo Vadis?’ European Public Law 17 (1): 73–89. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2011007.

Hartley, Trevor C. 1999. Constitutional Problems of the European Union. Hart.

———. 2014. The Foundations of European Union Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Union. Eighth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hatzopoulos, Vassilis. n.d. ‘Why the Open Method of Coordination Is Bad For You: A Letter to the EU’. European Law Journal 13 (3): 309–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00368.x.

Havu, Katri. n.d. ‘Horizontal Liability for Damages in EU Law-the Changing Relationship of EU and National Law’. European Law Journal 18 (3): 407–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00606.x.

Hepple, Bob. 2001. ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’. Industrial Law Journal 30 (2): 225–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/30.2.225.

Herdegen, Matthias. 1994. ‘Maastricht and the German Constitutional Court: Constitutional Restraints for an "Ever Closer Union” and Document "Extracts from: Brunner v. The European Union Treaty (Bundesverfassungsgericht)’. Common Market Law Review 31 (2): 235–62. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4e45a038-b213-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Héritier, Adrienne. n.d. ‘Institutional Change in Europe: Co-Decision and Comitology Transformed’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02226.x.

Herlin-Karnell, Ester. 2008. ‘The Ship–Source Pollution Case C–440/05, Commission v. Council , Judgment of 23 October 2007 (Grand Chamber)’. European Public Law 14 (Issue 4): 533–44. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2008036.

Hilson, Christopher, and T Antony Downes. 1999. ‘Making Sense of Rights: Community Rights in E.C. Law’. European Law Review 24 (2). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Hinarejos, Alicia. 2011. ‘Integration in Criminal Matters and the Role of the Court of Justice’. European Law Review 36 (3): 420–30. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Horsley, Thomas. n.d. ‘Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw?’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (2): 267–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x.

———. n.d. ‘Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw?’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (2): 267–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x.

Isiksel, N Türküler. n.d. ‘Fundamental Rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat’. European Law Journal 16 (5): 551–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x.

Israel De Jesus Butler. 2012. ‘Ensuring Compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in Legislative Drafting: The Practice of the European Commission’. European Law Review 37 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Itzcovich, Giulio. n.d. ‘Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts’. European Law Journal 18 (3): 358–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x.

———. n.d. ‘Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts’. European Law Journal 18 (3): 358–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x.

———. n.d. ‘Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts’. European Law Journal 18 (3): 358–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x.

Jacobs, Francis G. 2001a. ‘Human Rights in the European Union: The Role of the Court of Justice’. European Law Review 26 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2001b. ‘Human Rights in the European Union: The Role of the Court of Justice’. European Law Review 26 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2001c. ‘Human Rights in the European Union: The Role of the Court of Justice’. European Law Review 26 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Jacobs, Francis Geoffrey, Anthony Arnull, Piet Eeckhout, and Takis Tridimas. 2008. Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs. Oxford University Press. http://eu01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=10395381120002461&institutionId=2461&customerId=2460.

Jacqué, Jean Paul. 2011a. ‘The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’. Common Market Law Review 48 (4): 995–1023. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041.

———. 2011b. ‘The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’. Common Market Law Review 48 (4): 995–1023. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041.

Jans, Jan H. 2007. ‘The Effect in National Legal Systems of the Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Age as a General Principle of Community Law’. Legal Issues of Economic Integration 34 (1): 53–66. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=LEIE2007004.

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) and European Parliament v Council of the European Union. 27AD. Immigration policy - Right to family reunification of minor children of third country nationals - Directive 2003/86/EC - Protection of fundamental rights - Right to respect for family life - Obligation to have regard to the interests of minor children CURIA - Home - Court of Justice of the European Union.

Kiiver, Philipp. 2008. ‘The Treaty of Lisbon, The National Parliaments and the Principle of Subsidiarity’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 15 (1): 77–84. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=77&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje15&collection=journals.

———. 2011a. ‘The Early-Warning System for the Principle of Subsidiarity: The National Parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe’. European Law Review 36 (1): 98–108. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2011b. ‘The Early-Warning System for the Principle of Subsidiarity: The National Parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe’. European Law Review 36 (1): 98–108. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. n.d. ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court: A Court-Ordered Strengthening of the National Legislature in the EU’. European Law Journal 16 (5): 578–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00523.x.

Kilpatrick, Claire, Tonia Novitz, and Paul Skidmore, eds. 2000a. The Future of Remedies in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=1750717.

———. 2000b. The Future of Remedies in Europe. Hart.

Klamert, Marcus. n.d. ‘Conflicts of Legal Basis: No Legality and No Basis but a Bright Future under the Lisbon Treaty?’ European Law Review 35 (4): 497–515. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. n.d. ‘Conflicts of Legal Basis: No Legality and No Basis but a Bright Future under the Lisbon Treaty?’ European Law Review 35 (4): 497–515. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

‘Knocking on Heaven’s Door: Fragmentation, Efficiency and Defiance in the Preliminary Reference Procedure’. 2010. Common Market Law Review 40 (Issue 1): 9–50. https://doi.org/10.54648/5115417.

Komarek, Jan. 2007a. ‘In the Court(s) We Trust? On the Need for Hierarchy and Differentiation in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure’. European Law Review 32 (4): 467–91. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2007b. ‘In the Court(s) We Trust? On the Need for Hierarchy and Differentiation in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure’. European Law Review 32 (4): 467–91. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2007c. ‘In the Court(s) We Trust? On the Need for Hierarchy and Differentiation in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure’. European Law Review 32 (4): 467–91. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Konig, Thomas, and Dirk Junge. n.d. ‘Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power?’ European Union Politics 10 (4): 507–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509346780.

Koutrakos, Panos. 2011. ‘The Court of Justice as the Guardian of National Courts - or Not?’ European Law Review 36 (3): 319–20. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Kumm, Mattias. n.d. ‘The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty’. European Law Journal 11 (3): 262–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00260.x.

Kunoy, Bjørn, and Anthony Dawes. 2009. ‘Plate Tectonics in Luxembourg: The Ménage à Trois between EC Law, International Law and the European Convention on Human Rights Following the UN Sanctions Cases’. Common Market Law Review 46 (Issue 1): 73–104. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2009003.

La Torre, Massimo. n.d. ‘The Law beneath Rights’ Feet. Preliminary Investigation for a Study of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’. European Law Journal 8 (4): 515–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00163.

Leczykiewicz, Dorota. 2010. ‘“Effective Judicial Protection” of Human Rights after Lisbon: Should National Courts Be Empowered to Review EU Secondary Law?’ European Law Review 35 (3): 326–48. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Legrand, Pierre. 1996. ‘European Legal Systems Are Not Converging’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (1): 52–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/761068.

Lenaerts, Koen. 2007. ‘The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union’. Common Market Law Review 44 (6): 1625–59. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007138.

Lenaerts, Koen, and Tim Corthaut. 2006. ‘Of Birds and Hedges: The Role of Primacy in Invoking Norms of EU Law’. European Law Review 31 (3): 287–315. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

León, Sergio Alonso de. 2012. ‘Regions and Subsidiarity in the European Union: A Look at the Role of the Spanish and Other Regional Parliaments in the Monitoring of Compliance with the Principle of Subsidiarity’. European Public Law 18 (Issue 2): 305–21. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2012017.

Liisberg, Jonas Bering. 2001. ‘Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law?’ Common Market Law Review 38 (5): 1171–99. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=87cfa6a7-68d3-e711-80cd-005056af4099.

Lock, T. 2011a. ‘Walking on a Tightrope: The Draft ECHR Accession Agreement and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order’. Common Market Law Review 48 (4): 1025–54. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042.

———. 2011b. ‘Walking on a Tightrope: The Draft ECHR Accession Agreement and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order’. Common Market Law Review 48 (4): 1025–54. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042.

Lock, Tobias. 2011. ‘Taking National Courts More Seriously? Comment on Opinion 1/09’. European Law Review 36 (4): 576–88. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

MacCormick, Neil. n.d. ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’. The Modern Law Review 56 (1): 1–18. https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096572.

Mancini, G Federico, and David T Keeling. 1991. ‘From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge Facing the European Court’. Yearbook of European Law 11: 1–13. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d5a4f9a0-dfed-e611-80c9-005056af4099.

Masson, Antoine, and Claire Micheau. 2007. ‘The Werner Mangold Case: An Example of Legal Militancy’. European Public Law 13 (Issue 4): 587–93. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2007034.

Mikko, Mattila. 2008. ‘Unveiling the Council of the European Union | Ch 2: “Voting and Coalitions in the Council after Enlargement”’. In Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels, edited by Daniel Naurin and Helen Wallace, 23–35. Palgrave Macmillan. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ab345e06-b313-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Mitsilegas, Valsamis. 2009. ‘The Third Wave of Third Pillar Law. Which Direction for EU Criminal Justice?’ European Law Review 34 (4): 523–60. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Morano-Foadi, Sonia, and Stelios Andreadakis. n.d. ‘Reflections on the Architecture of the EU after the Treaty of Lisbon: The European Judicial Approach to Fundamental Rights’. European Law Journal 17 (5): 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00568.x.

Muir, Elise. 2011a. ‘Of Ages in – and Edges of – EU Law’. Common Market Law Review 48 (1): 39–62. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003.

———. 2011b. ‘Of Ages in – and Edges of – EU Law’. Common Market Law Review 48 (1): 39–62. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003.

Neve, Geert de, and Rebecca Prentice, eds. 2017. Unmaking the Global Sweatshop: Health and Safety of the World’s Garment Workers. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5106180.

Neyer, Jürgen. n.d. ‘Justice, Not Democracy: Legitimacy in the European Union’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 903–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02079.x.

Niglia, Leone. n.d. ‘Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The “Social” Character of Indirect Effect’. European Law Journal 16 (4): 439–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x.

———. n.d. ‘Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The “Social” Character of Indirect Effect’. European Law Journal 16 (4): 439–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x.

Ortega, Luis. 2005. ‘Fundamental Rights in the European Constitution’. European Public Law 11 (Issue 3): 363–73. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005029.

Papadopoulos, Thomas. 2011a. ‘Criticising the Horizontal Direct Effect of the EU General Principle of Equality’. European Law Review, no. 4. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2011b. ‘Criticising the Horizontal Direct Effect of the EU General Principle of Equality’. European Law Review, no. 4. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Payandeh, Mehrdad. 2011. ‘Constitutional Review of EU Law after Honeywell : Contextualizing the Relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice’. Common Market Law Review 48 (Issue 1): 9–38. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011002.

Peers, Steve. 2008. ‘The European Community’s Criminal Law Competence: The Plot Thickens’. European Law Review 33 (3): 399–410. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2010a. ‘Supremacy, Equality and Human Rights: Comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07)’. European Law Review 35 (6): 849–56. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2010b. ‘Supremacy, Equality and Human Rights: Comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07)’. European Law Review 35 (6): 849–56. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Peers, Steve, and Angela Ward, eds. 2004. The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: Politics, Law and Policy. Vol. Essays in European law. Hart Publishing.

Pliakos, Asterios, and Georgios Anagnostaras. 2011. ‘Who Is the Ultimate Arbiter? The Battle over Judicial Supremacy in EU Law’. European Law Review 36 (1): 109–23. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Prentice, Rebecca, and Geert de Neve, eds. 2017. Unmaking the Global Sweatshop: Health and Safety of the World’s Garment Workers. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Quénivet, Noëlle N. R., and Christian Dadomo. 2020. European Union Law. Third edition. Saltford: Hall & Stott Publishing.

Rasmussen, H. 1984. ‘The European Court’s Acte Clair Strategy in CILFIT’. European Law Review 9: 242–59. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1086f1b4-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Rawlings, Richard. n.d. ‘Legal Politics: The United Kingdom and Ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 1’. Public Law, 254–78. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. n.d. ‘Legal Politics: The United Kingdom and Ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 2’. Public Law, 367–91. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Reich, Norbert. n.d. ‘Horizontal Liability in EC Law: Hybridization of Remedies for Compensation in Case of Breaches of EC Rights’. Common Market Law Review 44 (3): 705–42. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007066.

Rittberger, Berthold. n.d. ‘Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02225.x.

Ross, Malcolm. 1993. ‘Beyond Francovich’. The Modern Law Review 56 (1): 55–73. https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096574.

———. 2006a. ‘Effectiveness in the European Legal Order(s): Beyond Supremacy to Constitutional Proportionality?’ European Law Review 31 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2006b. ‘Effectiveness in the European Legal Order(s): Beyond Supremacy to Constitutional Proportionality?’ European Law Review 31 (4). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Roy W. Davis. 2006. ‘Liability in Damages for a Breach of Community Law: Some Reflections on the Question of Who to Sue and the Concept of “the State”’. European Law Review 31 (1). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Ruiter, Rik de, and Christine Neuhold. n.d. ‘Why Is Fast Track the Way to Go? Justifications for Early Agreement in the Co-Decision Procedure and Their Effects’. European Law Journal 18 (4): 536–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00617.x.

Sabel, Charles F, and Oliver Gerstenberg. n.d. ‘Constitutionalising an Overlapping Consensus: The ECJ and the Emergence of a Coordinate Constitutional Order’. European Law Journal 16 (5): 511–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00521.x.

Sabel, Charles F, and Jonathan Zeitlin. n.d. ‘Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU’. European Law Journal 14 (3): 271–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x.

Schutze, Robert. 2007. ‘Dual Federalism Constitutionalised: The Emergence of Exclusive Competences in the EC Legal Order’. European Law Review 32 (1). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Schütze, Robert. 2009a. ‘Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 68 (3): 525–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309990183.

———. 2009b. ‘Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 68 (3): 525–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309990183.

———. 2015. European Union Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2016. European Constitutional Law. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Scicluna, Nicole. n.d. ‘When Failure Isn’t Failure: European Union Constitutionalism after the Lisbon Treaty’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (3): 441–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02239.x.

Shore, Cris. n.d. ‘“European Governance” or Governmentality? The European Commission and the Future of Democratic Government’. European Law Journal 17 (3): 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00551.x.

Shuibhne, Niamh Nic. 2009a. ‘Margins of Appreciation: National Values, Fundamental Rights and EC Free Movement Law’. European Law Review 34 (2): 230–56. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2009b. ‘Margins of Appreciation: National Values, Fundamental Rights and EC Free Movement Law’. European Law Review 34 (2): 230–56. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

———. 2009c. ‘The Reality of Rights: From Rhetoric to Opt-Out’. European Law Review 34 (6): 815–16. http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Solanke, Iyiola. n.d. ‘“Stop the ECJ”?: An Empirical Analysis of Activism at the Court’. European Law Journal 17 (6): 764–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00561.x.

Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH). 14AD. ‘Report to the Committee of Ministers on  the Elaboration of Legal Instruments for the Accession of  the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights’. Statewatch: Monitoring the State and Civil Liberties in Europe. Council of Europe. https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2011/oct/coe-eu-accession-echr-14-10.11.pdf.

Szyszczak, Erika. n.d. ‘Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination’. European Law Journal 12 (4): 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00329.x.

‘The Scope of Application of the General Principles of Union Law: An Ever Expanding Union?’ 2010a. Common Market Law Review 47 (6): 1589–96. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067.

‘———’. 2010b. Common Market Law Review 47 (6): 1589–96. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067.

Thüsing, Gregor, and Sally Horler. 2010a. ‘Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010’. Common Market Law Review 47 (4): 1161–72. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049.

———. 2010b. ‘Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010’. Common Market Law Review 10 (4): 1161–72. https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049.

Thym, Daniel. 2009. ‘In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court’. Common Market Law Review 46 (Issue 6): 1795–1822. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2009074.

Tison, Michel. 2005. ‘Do Not Attack the Watchdog! Banking Supervisor’s Liability after Peter Paul’. Common Market Law Review 42 (Issue 3): 639–75. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005024.

Toth, A G. 1994. ‘Is Subsidiarity Justiciable?’ European Law Review 19 (3). http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.

Triantafyllou, Dimitris. 2002. ‘The European Charter of Fundamental Rights and the "Rule of Law’’: Restricting Fundamental Rights by Reference’. Common Market Law Review 39 (1): 53–64. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/39.1/402757.

Tridimas, Takis. 2001a. ‘Black, White, and Shades of Grey: Horizontality of Directives Revisited’. Yearbook of European Law 21 (1): 327–54. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197523?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182.

———. 2001b. ‘Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down?’ Common Market Law Review 38 (Issue 2): 301–32. https://doi.org/10.54648/334301.

———. 2006. The General Principles of EU Law. Second. Vol. Oxford EC law library. Oxford University Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip068/2006005363.html.

———. 2015. The General Principles of EU Law. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.

Trubek, David M, and Louise G Trubek. n.d. ‘Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: The Role of the Open Method of Co-Ordination’. European Law Journal 11 (3): 343–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x.

Van Gerven, W. n.d. ‘Bridging the Unbridgeable: Community and National Tort Laws after Francovich and Brasserie’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (3): 507–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/760680.

Von Bogdandy, Armin, Matthias Kottmann, Carlino Antpöhler, Johanna Dickschen, Simon Hentrei, and Maja Smrkolj. 2012. ‘Reverse Solange–Protecting the Essence of Fundamental Rights against EU Member States’. Common Market Law Review 49 (2): 489–519. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/49.2/COLA2012018.

Vossestein, Gert-Jan. n.d. ‘Cross-Border Transfer of Seat and Conversion of Companies under the EC Treaty Provisions on Freedom of Establishment’. European Company Law 6 (3): 115–23. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5d2bc332-54f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099.

Waele, Henri de, and Hansko Broeksteeg. 2012. ‘The Semi-Permanent European Council Presidency: Some Reflections on the Law and Early Practice’. Common Market Law Review 49 (Issue 3): 1039–74. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012038.

Walker, Neil. n.d. ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’. Modern Law Review 65 (3): 317–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00383.

Ward, Ian. 2009. A Critical Introduction to European Law. 3rd ed. Vol. The law in context series. Cambridge University Press.

Wattel, Peter J. 2004a. ‘Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We Can’t Go on Meeting like This’. Common Market Law Review 41 (Issue 1): 177–90. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2003075.

———. 2004b. ‘Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We Can’t Go on Meeting like This’. Common Market Law Review 41 (Issue 1): 177–90. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2003075.

Wattel, Peter J. 2008. ‘National Procedural Autonomy and Effectiveness of EC Law: Challenge the Charge, File for Restitution, Sue for Damages?’ Legal Issues of Economic Integration 35 (2): 109–32.

Weatherill, Stephen. 2016. Cases and Materials on EU Law. Twelfth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Weiler, J H H. n.d. ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’. European Law Journal 1 (3): 219–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00030.x.

Weiler, J H H, and Nicolas J S Lockhart. 1995. ‘"Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and Its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence – Part I’. Common Market Law Review 32 (1): 51–94. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6d040b1d-2546-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Woods, Lorna, Philippa Watson, Marios Costa, and Josephine Steiner. 2017. Steiner & Woods EU Law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Young, Alison L. 2005. ‘The Charter, Constitution and Human Rights: Is This the Beginning or the End for Human Rights Protections by Community Law?’ European Public Law 11 (2): 219–40. https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.2/EURO2005020.

Zbíral, Robert. 2012. ‘Czech Constitutional Court, Judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12.  A Legal Revolution or Negligible Episode? Court of Justice Decision Proclaimed Ultra Vires’. Common Market Law Review 49 (Issue 4): 1475–91. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012072.

Ziller, Jacques. 2010. ‘The German Constitutional Court’s Friendliness towards European Law: On the Judgment of Bundesverfassungsgericht over the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon’. European Public Law 16 (Issue 1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2010004.